From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gyro-Trac (Usa), Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Mar 30, 2010
C/A No. 10-01908-DD (Bankr. D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010)

Opinion

C/A No. 10-01908-DD.

March 30, 2010


ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY USE OF CASH COLLATERAL


GENERIC ORDER RE:

The relief set forth on the following pages, for a total of 5 pages including this page, is hereby ORDERED.

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon (1) an Application to Pay Creditors, (2) a Motion for Continuation of Utility Service, and (3) a Motion to Use Cash Collateral (collectively "Motions") filed by Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc. ("Debtor"). Objections to Debtor's Motions were filed by Bank of Montreal ("BOM") and Branch Banking and Trust Company ("BB T"). A hearing was held and the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52, made applicable to this contested matter by Fed.R.Bankr.P. 7052 and 9014.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Debtor filed a voluntary petition under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on March 17, 2010. Debtor's business involves manufacturing, sales and servicing of heavy equipment, used in the clearing of land and mulching of timber. Daniel Gaudreault, president of the Debtor, developed some of the technology employed in the Debtor's business. Debtor's principle place of business is Summerville, South Carolina. At some point prior to the filing of this case, Debtor ceased it manufacturing operation but continues to sell and service forestry equipment. At the time of the hearing, Debtor employs approximately fifteen (15) individuals.

On or about March 22, 2007, the Debtor entered into a financing agreement with BB T, pursuant to which BB T agreed to finance the purchase of inventory. The security agreement between Debtor and BB T provides for security in all the Debtor's new land clearing equipment and vehicles, accounts, and proceeds of the inventory.

On or about October 6, 2006, Debtor guaranteed a debt owed to BOM by a related Canadian corporation known as Gyro Trac West Coast, Inc. Gyro Trac West Coast is in default of its obligation to BMO. Gyro Trac West Coast is a California corporation. One hundred (100%) percent of the outstanding stock of Gyro Trac West Coast is owned by Gyro-Trac, Inc. ("GTI"), a Canadian corporation. GTI also owns one hundred (100%) percent of the outstanding stock of the Debtor. All three companies, as well as a recently formed company Gyro-Trac International, Inc. ("GTII"), are owned by or controlled by Daniel Gaudreault. BOM holds a lien on all of the personal property of the Debtor of every kind and nature, including all accounts, equipment, accessions, fixtures, and inventory. BOM acknowledges that its lien on all new inventory of the Debtor is subject only to the security interest of BB T.

Gyro-Trac West Coast and GTI are also debtors in chapter 11 proceedings currently before this Court, case numbers 10-1909-dd and 10-01910-dd respectively.

The value of Debtor's assets is unclear. The Debtor has new equipment on hand which is not selling, or is selling at a deeply discounted price. Debtor holds some used equipment. The Debtor has cash in its accounts which are proceeds from the sale of parts inventory and used forestry equipment. There is a parts inventory for the manufacturing process which was purchased for $1,300,000, the current value of this inventory is unknown because the Debtor is not currently manufacturing new forestry equipment.

The Debtor anticipates sales of new machines in order to generate additional cash. Debtor's budget currently reflects income from the contingent sale of new forestry equipment. During the period for which the emergency use of cash collateral is requested, Debtor proposes to pay a salary to insiders including Daniel Gaudreault and his spouse Patricia Tremblay. Debtor's budget also includes payments to GTII in exchange for new inventory that is to be purchased by GTII for the benefit of the Debtor, prior to a final hearing on the use of cash collateral. Debtor's budget also calls for a payment of rent to Tremblay and Sons, a company owned by insiders of the Debtor.

At the hearing Debtor was unable to provide an exact amount of cash necessary to cover its expenses until a final hearing on cash collateral could be held.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The Bankruptcy Code provides that a preliminary hearing on the use of cash collateral is to be held on the request of the Debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 363(c)(3). The temporary use of cash collateral should be authorized by the Court if there is a reasonable likelihood that the debtor will prevail at the final hearing on the use of cash collateral. Id. During the initial stages of a bankruptcy, the use of cash collateral should be limited to emergency matters. See Bankwest N.A. v. Todd, 49 B.R. 633, 635 (D.C.S.D. 1985) (holding that by keeping debtors on a shorter tether, the risks associated with the use of cash collateral are reduced because the amount of money at stake is reduced).

In determining whether to allow the use of cash collateral, there is a presumption in favor of reorganization. See In re Greenwood Bldg. Supply, Inc., 23 B.R. 720 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 1982) (finding there is a presumption in favor of chapter 11 reorganization, but if it is obvious that a debtor cannot reorganize or that it has wasted assets, the court should reach a different conclusion). It is a debtor's burden of proof to show that its creditor's interest will be adequately protected while cash collateral is used. A debtor must carry that burden by a preponderance of the evidence. But see, In re Glasstream Boats, Inc., 110 B.R. 611, 613 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1990). Adequate protection can take many forms. See In re JKJ Chevrolet, Inc., 190 B.R. 542, 545 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1995) ( citing In re O'Connor, 808 F.2d 1393, 1396-97 (10th Cir. 1987) (finding that adequate protection is a concept which is to be decided flexibly on a case-by-case basis)).

Adequate protection may be provided by requiring a debtor to make a cash payments to the extent of a decrease in the value of collateral, the debtor may provide for an additional or replacement lien to the extent of a decrease in value, or the granting of such other relief that is an equivalent of the interest in property. 11 U.S.C. § 361.

In this case Debtor is only able to offer a promise that if the business continues, the $1,300,000 in parts inventory purchased for manufacturing new forestry equipment will not lose its value. While there is a presumption in favor of reorganization in chapter 11 cases, the efforts to reorganize depend in significant part on a manufacturing facility that is under the protection of Canadian bankruptcy authorities. Additional funding will be necessary to bring manufacturing outside the jurisdiction of the Canadian authority and to resume the manufacturing process. In this case there is not a sufficient foundation to order the interim use of cash collateral on a provisional basis. It is apparent that without the rejection of certain executor contracts, Debtor's only ongoing business is the servicing of forestry equipment.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Debtor's Motions are DENIED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

Notice Recipients

Recipients of Notice of Electronic Filing: Recipients submitted to the BNC (Bankruptcy Noticing Center):

District/Off: 0420-2 User: lee Date Created: 3/30/2010 Case: 10-01908-dd Form ID: pdf01 Total: 27 ust US Trustee's Office USTPRegion04.CO.ECF@usdoj.gov aty Cynthia Jordan Lowery cynthialowery@mvalaw.com aty Dina G. Boorda dboorda@robinsonlaw.com aty R. William Metzger, Jr. bmetzger@robinsonlaw.com aty Robert E. Culver bob@culverlaw.net aty Tara E. Nauful tnauful@hsblawfirm.com TOTAL: 6 db Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc. 10 Flying Cloud Drive Summerville, SC 29483-8113 cr Bank of Montreal c/o Tara E. Nauful Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. P.O. Box 11889 Columbia, SC 29211 cr PricewaterhouseCoopers, Inc., in its capacity as court appointed receiver for certain assets of Usitech-Nov, Inc. c/p Tara E. Nauful Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A. P.O. Box 1189 Columbia, SC 29211 541374764 Bank of Montreal 500 East Grande Allee Quebec CANADA 541374765 Bearing Disbributors POB 887 Columbia SC 29202 541374780 D I Technologies 820 Shull Street Suite 4 West Columbia SC 29169 541374788 Engrenage Provincial Inc. 960 Rue Raoul Jobin Quebec QC G1N 1S9 CANADA 541374790 Everest Freight Logistics 8300 Cote De Liesse Suite 207 Montreal, QC Canada H4T 1G7 CANADA 541374791 Fasken Martineau DuuMoulin S.E.N.C.R.L. Bureau 800 / 140 Grande Allee Est, Quebec Canada QCG1R5M8 CANADA 541374798 GMAC POB 9001948 Louisville KY 40290 541374801 Goodsell Transport, LLC 210 S Cedar Street Summerville SC 29483 541374807 J.R. Merritt Controls, Inc. 55 Sperry Avenue Stratford CT 06615 541374810 Lamtech 81 rue Principale St. — Prime QC Canada G8J1V1 CANADA 541374830 Roadway/YRC POB 905587 Charlotte NC 28290 541374831 RYCO Hydraulics Inc 1616 Greens Road Houston TX 77032 541374840 Thompson Knight, LLC 333 Clay Sreet Houston TX 77002 541374841 Thunder Bay c/o Robert Lowe, Lowe Associates Wachovia Center 177 Meeting Street, Suite 400 Charleston SC 29401 541374844 Tuttle Dozer Works, Inc. In care of Paul Tinkler, Esq. POB 366 Charleston SC 29402 541374845 Tuttle Dozer Works, Inc. 701 Walker Drive Interlachen FL 32148 541374850 Usitech Nov Industries 1295, 1 Ere Rue QC G6E 3T3 Canada CANADA 541374857 Vermeer Manufacturing 1210 Vermeer Road East Pella IA 50219 TOTAL: 21


Summaries of

In re Gyro-Trac (Usa), Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Mar 30, 2010
C/A No. 10-01908-DD (Bankr. D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010)
Case details for

In re Gyro-Trac (Usa), Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: Gyro-Trac (USA), Inc., Chapter 11, Debtor(s)

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina

Date published: Mar 30, 2010

Citations

C/A No. 10-01908-DD (Bankr. D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2010)