- Search with
- Parallel SearchEnter a full sentence between 5 and 30 words to find cases with conceptually similar sentences
- or
- Keyword SearchEnter keyword terms, accompanied by optional Boolean connectors
- ANDfraud AND damagesBoth terms in document
- ORcar OR automobileEither term in document
- NOTinfringement NOT patentTerm must not appear in document
- """due diligence"Exact match
- ()appeal AND (verdict OR judgment)Grouping terms
- *withdr*wSingle letter wildcard (withdraw, withdrew)
- !infring!Root expander (infringe, infringed, infringing)
- /ninvestor /5 diligenceTerms within n words of each other
- /sfees /s reasonableTerms within same sentence
- /padmissible /p warrantTerms within the same paragraph
In re Guardianship Conservatorship of Bowman
12 Neb. App. 891 (Neb. Ct. App. 2004) In re Guardianship Conservatorship of Bowman
4 Citing cases
In re Guardianship
No. A-03-1207 (Neb. Nov. 24, 2004)November 24, 2004. 12 Neb. App. 891 (2004). Petition of appellee for further review overruled on November 24, 2004.
Heimes v. Arens
A-20-790 (Neb. Ct. App. Nov. 16, 2021)6 The Heimeses also cite to In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Bowman, 12 Neb.App. 891, 686 N.W.2d 642 (2004). In that case, this court found that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to entertain a party's motions seeking clarification of a prior order after the time for appeal had passed.
In re Malloy
No. A-05-478 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 1, 2006)Summarily reversed and remanded. See, rule 7A(3); In re Guardianship Conservatorship of Bowman, 12 Neb. App. 891, 686 N.W.2d 642 (2004).
In re Guardianship Conservatorship
No. A-03-1207 (Neb. Ct. App. Jan. 1, 2004)No. A-03-1207.2004 12 Neb. App. 891 (2004). Petition of appellee for further review overruled on November 24, 2004.