Opinion
No. 09-60003.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed October 8, 2010.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Montali, Markell, and Efremsky, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding. BAP No. AZ-08-1079-MkEMo.
Before: THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appellants appeal the bankruptcy court's approval of a settlement between Appellees David Reaves, the bankruptcy trustee, and Comerica Bank. However, Appellants' brief does not identify any error in any of the bankruptcy court's rulings.
Rather, Appellants appear to be seeking on appeal an advisory opinion about the effects of the settlement agreement on other litigation. We lack jurisdiction to render advisory opinions. See Kittel v. Thomas, 620 F.3d 949, 951 (9th Cir. 2010).