From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Greenberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
May 7, 2015
114 A.3d 981 (D.C. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14–BG–1467.

05-07-2015

In re Mitchell A. GREENBERG, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of 30 days, see Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland v. Greenberg, 440 Md. 223, 101 A.3d 1061 (2014), this court's January 20, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause why the reciprocal discipline of a 30–day suspension should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent filed his affidavit as required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) on February 2, 2015, it is

ORDERED that Mitchell A. Greenberg is hereby suspended for a period of 30 days, nunc pro tunc to February 2, 2015. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C.2010), and In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C.2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate).


Summaries of

In re Greenberg

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
May 7, 2015
114 A.3d 981 (D.C. 2015)
Case details for

In re Greenberg

Case Details

Full title:In re Mitchell A. GREENBERG, Respondent.

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: May 7, 2015

Citations

114 A.3d 981 (D.C. 2015)