Opinion
Argued April 4, 2000.
May 15, 2000.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay dated October 1, 1998, which, after a hearing, affirmed a determination of the respondent Department of Planning and Development of the Town of Oyster Bay denying the petitioners' application for site plan approval, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated April 14, 1999, which granted the petition and annulled the determination.
Chris J. Coschignano, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Eric P. Milgrim of counsel), for appellants Jack L. Libert, Wayne R. Brown, Buddy Mazzara, Scott F. Guardino, Jacqueline A. Watters, Susan Cloninger, and Joseph Bordino.
Gregory J. Giammalvo, Town Attorney, Oyster Bay, N.Y. (Anthony J. Sabino and Karen Locurto of counsel), for appellants Town of Oyster Bay, Louis Warner, and Patricia L. McGuire.
Forchelli, Curto, Schwartz, Mineo, Carlino Cohn, LLP, Mineola, N Y (Vincent J. Pizzulli, Jr., and Joseph F. Buzzell of counsel), for respondent Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co., Inc.
Michael H. Sahn, PLLC, Garden City, N.Y. (Beth J. Goldmacher on the brief), for respondent Sears, Roebuck Co.
DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the Supreme Court properly interpreted the zoning provisions of the Town Code of the Town of Oyster Bay and properly granted the petition (see, Matter of Tallini v. Rose, 208 A.D.2d 546, 547; Matter of KMO-361 Realty Assocs. v. Davies, 204 A.D.2d 547; Matter of Chrysler Realty Corp. v. Orneck, 196 A.D.2d 631).
RITTER, J.P., SULLIVAN, ALTMAN and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.