From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Graff

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 8, 2014
585 F. App'x 1012 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Opinion

2014-1288

12-08-2014

IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF

MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office P.C., of Chicago, Illinois. JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 10/885,569.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL K. MUTTER, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was D. RICHARD ANDERSON. Of counsel on the brief was PETER K. TRYNA, Peter K. Trzyna Law Office P.C., of Chicago, Illinois. JOSEPH MATEL, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Deputy Solicitor, and AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 8, 2014

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Graff

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 8, 2014
585 F. App'x 1012 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Case details for

In re Graff

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RICHARD A. GRAFF

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 2014

Citations

585 F. App'x 1012 (Fed. Cir. 2014)