From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gore

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 2, 2017
No. 05-17-00444-CV (Tex. App. May. 2, 2017)

Opinion

No. 05-17-00444-CV

05-02-2017

IN RE TERRENCE MARK GORE, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF12-12707-U

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Fillmore, Whitehill, and Boatright
Opinion by Justice Fillmore

Before the Court is relator's April 28, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which he complains of the trial court's order granting real party in interest's motion to expunge lis pendens. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Robert M. Fillmore/

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

JUSTICE 170444F.P05


Summaries of

In re Gore

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 2, 2017
No. 05-17-00444-CV (Tex. App. May. 2, 2017)
Case details for

In re Gore

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TERRENCE MARK GORE, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: May 2, 2017

Citations

No. 05-17-00444-CV (Tex. App. May. 2, 2017)