From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gonzalez

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 9, 2020
241 N.J. 526 (N.J. 2020)

Opinion

D-50 September Term 2019 083729

04-09-2020

In the MATTER OF Nelson GONZALEZ, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 020401997)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 19-129, DRB 19-130 and DRB 19-131, concluding that Nelson Gonzalez of Dover, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1997, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for his multiple violations of RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and promptly comply with reasonable requests for information), RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain a matter to the extent reasonably necessary for the client to make informed decisions about the representation), RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds, negligent misappropriation), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), RPC 3.2 (failure to expedite litigation), RPC 3.4(d) (failure to comply with reasonable discovery requests), RPC 5.3(a) (failure to supervise nonlawyer staff), RPC 8.1(a) (false statement of material fact to a disciplinary authority), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a three-month suspension from practice is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent's unethical conduct;

And the Court having determined that as a condition of reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent should submit proof that his wife is not employed by him or given access in any manner to respondent's law practice or attorney accounts, books and records; And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Nelson Gonzalez is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective May 7, 2020, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Nelson Gonzalez shall not employ his wife or give her access to his law practice or his attorney accounts, books and records and shall provide proof thereof to the Office of Attorney Ethics prior to reinstatement to practice; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20-20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20-20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(d) ; and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10-2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Gonzalez

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Apr 9, 2020
241 N.J. 526 (N.J. 2020)
Case details for

In re Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Nelson GONZALEZ, An Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Apr 9, 2020

Citations

241 N.J. 526 (N.J. 2020)
230 A.3d 205

Citing Cases

In re Marcus

This decision is troubling and reminiscent of a similar case we recently considered. See In re Gonzalez, 241…

In re Maloney

This decision is troubling and reminiscent of a similar case recently heard by the Board. See In re …