From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1996
234 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 23, 1996.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition and mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Justice Harry E. Seidell to render a decision on the petitioner's motion to remove the receiver in an action entitled Steven L. Goldman v Dennis L. Bernardini, et al., pending in the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, under Suffolk County Index No. 5741/94.

Before: Miller, J.P., Ritter, Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ.


Upon the petition and papers filed in support of the proceeding, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the branch of the petition which seeks relief in the nature of prohibition is dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Adjudged that the remaining branch of the petition is denied, without costs or disbursements, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

CPLR 2219 provides in relevant part that an order determining a motion shall be made within 60 days after the motion has been submitted for decision. Since the court, in its discretion, granted the responding party until December 6, 1996, to respond to the motion to remove the receiver, the portion of the petition which is in the nature of mandamus to compel the court to render a decision is premature.


Summaries of

In re Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1996
234 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Goldman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of STEVEN L. GOLDMAN, Petitioner, v. HARRY E. SEIDELL et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 547 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

Gitzis v. Baily-Schiffman

The petitioner commenced this proceeding for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent Loren…