From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Golding Barge Line, Inc.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jul 26, 2012
NO. 01-12-00608-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 26, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 01-12-00608-CV

07-26-2012

IN RE GOLDING BARGE LINE, INC., Relator


Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Golding Barge Line, Inc. filed a petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court's June 29, 2012 order vacating its earlier order that compelled David Heep, the real party in interest, to submit to a medical examination in the course of discovery in his workplace-injury lawsuit. The trial court has indicated that it will reconsider ordering Heep to submit to a medical examination after he has recovered from surgery.

The underlying case is David S. Heep v. Golding Barge Line, Inc.; Cause Number 2011-09342, in the 113th District Court of Harris County, Texas, Honorable John Donovan, presiding.

Because the relator has not shown a clear abuse of discretion, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Brown.


Summaries of

In re Golding Barge Line, Inc.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Jul 26, 2012
NO. 01-12-00608-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 26, 2012)
Case details for

In re Golding Barge Line, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE GOLDING BARGE LINE, INC., Relator

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Jul 26, 2012

Citations

NO. 01-12-00608-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 26, 2012)