Opinion
NO. 01-17-00673-CV
10-17-2017
IN RE HAROLD GOLDBERG, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In this mandamus proceeding, relator contends that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion for new trial. We lack jurisdiction over the associate judge.
The underlying case is In the Matter of the Marriage of Jennifer Karpinsky-Goldberg v. Harold Goldberg, cause number 2016-68107, pending in the 308th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable David Sydow presiding.
See In re Clark, 01-15-00458-CV, 2017 WL 387787, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 23, 2015, orig. proceeding) (holding that court of appeals does not have jurisdiction over associate judge). We note that the Texas Legislature has recently changed our mandamus jurisdiction to encompass associate judges. See Act of May 27, 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., ch. 1013, H.B. 1480, § 1 (to be codified as an amendment to TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221). However, the change in the statute applies to suits filed after September 1, 2017. Id. § 2 ("Section 22.221(b) . . . as amended by this Act, applies only to a suit . . . filed on or after the effective date of this Act."). Because this original proceeding was filed August 23, 2017, we lack jurisdiction.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM Panel consist of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes and Brown.