From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gleason

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 7, 2011
206 N.J. 139 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

June 7, 2011.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-395, concluding that MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON of BOUND BROOK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate to client in writing the basis or rate of the fee), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), and RPC 1.15(d) (failure to comply with the recordkeeping requirements of R. 1:21-6), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Gleason

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 7, 2011
206 N.J. 139 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In re Gleason

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARTIN ALBERT GLEASON, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 7, 2011

Citations

206 N.J. 139 (N.J. 2011)
19 A.3d 984

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith

77 belonging to other clients; when the deal fell through, the attorney, who had forgotten about the $3,500…

In re Wolfe

See, e.g., In re Cameron, 221 N.J. 238 (2015) (on a motion for discipline by consent, attorney guilty of…