From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gillespie

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Dec 28, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-3645 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-3645.

December 28, 2005


ORDER OF DISMISSAL


The Bankruptcy Rules provide that a party desiring to appeal from a final judgment of a bankruptcy judge to a district court must file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the bankruptcy court within ten days of entry of the contested order. FED.R.BANKR.P. 8001(a), 8002(a). Additionally, within ten days after filing the notice of appeal, "the appellant shall file with the clerk of the bankruptcy court and serve on the appellee a designation of the items to be included in the record on appeal and a statement of the issues to be presented." FED. R. BANKR. P. 8006. Rule 8009(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Rules require the appellant to file a brief with the district court "within 15 days after entry of the appeal pursuant to Rule 8007." Bankruptcy Rule 8001(a) allows the district court to dismiss an appeal if the appellant fails to take any step required under the rules for proper prosecution of an appeal.

The appellate courts have affirmed dismissals of bankruptcy appeals for failure to comply with the rules. See Nielsen v. Price, 17 F.3d 1276, 1277 (10th Cir. 1994) (affirming dismissal of appeal from bankruptcy court judgment because, without explanation, the plaintiffs failed to designate the record on appeal, file a statement of the issues, or file an appellate brief); In Re Serra Builders, Inc., 970 F.2d 1309, 1311 (4th Cir. 1992) (affirming dismissal of a bankruptcy appeal because the appellant filed its designation of the record on appeal fifteen days late and did not request an extension until after the deadline had passed; noting that the only explanation offered was that the appellant's attorney was out of the country); Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Braniff Airways, Inc., 774 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1985).

In this case, the notice of appeal was timely filed on October 21, 2005. No designation of record or brief has been received, and no request for an extension of time has been filed. The apparent absence of any intent to prosecute and the failure to comply with the rules leads this court to dismiss the appeal.


Summaries of

In re Gillespie

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division
Dec 28, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-3645 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2005)
Case details for

In re Gillespie

Case Details

Full title:In Re DARYL GILLESPIE Debtor

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division

Date published: Dec 28, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-3645 (S.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2005)