From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Germano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 30, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1877 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

PM-69-19

05-30-2019

In the MATTER OF Michael Nole GERMANO, a Suspended Attorney. (Attorney Registration No. 4090411)

Michael Nole Germano, Monument, Colorado, respondent pro se. Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.


Michael Nole Germano, Monument, Colorado, respondent pro se.

Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Before: Garry, P.J., Mulvey, Devine, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION

Per Curiam.Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2002 and presently resides in Colorado, where he was admitted in 2007. By May 16, 2019 order of this Court, respondent was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in this state upon the presentation of uncontroverted evidence by the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department that he had engaged in professional misconduct due to his repeated failure to comply with his biennial registration obligations in this state ( Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 172 A.D.3d 1706, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 03883, 2019 WL 2127298 [2019] ). Respondent now applies to resign from the New York bar pursuant to Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters ( 22 NYCRR) § 1240.10, and the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department advises that it has no objection to the application.

An attorney may resign from the practice of law in the face of a disciplinary investigation or proceeding provided that he or she acknowledges the nature of the charges or allegations at issue and attests that he or she cannot successfully defend against same (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.10 [a][2] ). Further, the resigning attorney must attest that his or her resignation is given voluntarily and without coercion or duress, and that the attorney is fully aware of the consequences of the resignation, including that the resulting determination of the Court will include an order of disbarment (see Matter of Bartman, 156 A.D.3d 1213, 1214, 67 N.Y.S.3d 357 [2017] ; Matter of Clark, 154 A.D.3d 1269, 1270, 64 N.Y.S.3d 696 [2017] ; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.10 [a][1] ).

In the instant matter, respondent appropriately completed the requisite form affidavit (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] part 1240, appendix A), wherein he acknowledges that he has engaged in misconduct due to his failure to fulfill his biennial registration obligations (see Judiciary Law § 468–a [5 ]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 113 A.D.3d 1020, 1021, 979 N.Y.S.2d 548 [2014] ; Matter of Arms, 251 A.D.2d 743, 743–744, 674 N.Y.S.2d 156 [1998] ; Rules of Chief Admin of Cts [ 22 NYCRR] § 118.1 [h]; Rules of Professional Conduct [ 22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 8.4[d] ). He further acknowledges that his resignation is entered into freely, without coercion or duress, and he also indicates his understanding that, upon the Court accepting his resignation, it will issue an order of disbarment. We accordingly grant respondent's application and accept his resignation.

Garry, P.J., Mulvey, Devine, Aarons and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the application of respondent to resign as an attorney and counselor-at-law is granted and his disciplinary resignation is accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form in the State of New York, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto, or to hold himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law in this State; and it is furtherORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys and shall duly certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.15 ).


Summaries of

In re Germano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 30, 2019
172 A.D.3d 1877 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

In re Germano

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL NOLE GERMANO, a Suspended Attorney.

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 30, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 1877 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
99 N.Y.S.3d 722
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 4262

Citing Cases

In re Stacy

Accordingly, we deny that part of AGC's motion and turn to respondent's cross motion to resign while…

In re Mariner

The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department (hereinafter AGC) does not oppose…