From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gensib

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 29, 2012
56 A.3d 859 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

D-30 September Term 2012, 071772

11-29-2012

In the Matter of Carl D. GENSIB, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 029931990).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12–187, concluding that CARL D. GENSIB of NORTH BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1990, should be censured for violating RPC 1.4(c) (failure to explain a matter to the extent necessary for the client to make informed decisions about the representation) and RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate the basis or rate of the fee in writing), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CARL D. GENSIB is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Gensib

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Nov 29, 2012
56 A.3d 859 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Gensib

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Carl D. GENSIB, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

56 A.3d 859 (N.J. 2012)
212 N.J. 465

Citing Cases

In re Gensib

Specifically, he failed to explain a matter to the client to the extent necessary for the client to make…