From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Garment Center Capitol, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 6, 1935
13 F. Supp. 908 (S.D.N.Y. 1935)

Opinion

May 6, 1935.

Schiff, Dorfman Stein, of New York City, for petitioner Alice E. Cohen.

O'Connor Farber, of New York City, for temporary trustees.

Lind, Shlivek, Marks Brin, of New York City, for David H. Orgel.

Greenbaum, Wolff Ernst, of New York City, for debenture holders' committee.

Cravath, deGersdorff, Swaine Wood and William Klein, all of New York City, for debtors.

Paskus, Gordon Hyman, of New York City, for Harold W. Bonwit.

Carl J. Austrian, of New York City, for Bank of United States.

David K. Shappiro, of New York City, for petitioning creditors.

Hutner Hutner, of New York City, for creditors Jablow Fox.

Isaac N. Jacobson, of New York City, for debenture holder Baer.

Pollock Nemerov, of New York City, for other debenture holders.


In Bankruptcy. Proceeding in the matter of the Garment Center Capitol, Incorporated, wherein Alice E. Cohen petitioned for intervention.

Application to intervene denied.


No facts are furnished to sustain an application to intervene.

The petitioner, without intervention, is entitled to notice of hearing on any proposed plan of reorganization. The statute so provides. So far as concerns the facts disclosed, the petitioner needs nothing but an opportunity to be heard on such a plan.

It is merely obstructive and merely increases the expense of administering the estate, and hence is adverse to the interests of all creditors (including the petitioner), to multiply the number of interveners.

The court will gladly hear any person interested. Nevertheless, the procedure to assure hearing of everybody should be orderly. Moreover, the expense should be held to such minimum as is reasonably practicable and is consistent with fair opportunity to all. Because of the absence of affirmative showing of good ground for adding the petitioner as a formal party in this proceeding, and thereby hampering the prompt disposition of routine matters, the application is denied.

Settle order on two days' notice.


Summaries of

In re Garment Center Capitol, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 6, 1935
13 F. Supp. 908 (S.D.N.Y. 1935)
Case details for

In re Garment Center Capitol, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re GARMENT CENTER CAPITOL, Inc

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 6, 1935

Citations

13 F. Supp. 908 (S.D.N.Y. 1935)

Citing Cases

In re Associated Gas Electric Co.

And then it has been held to rest in the sound discretion of the court. In re General Theatres Equipment,…