From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gardner

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 20, 2014
No. 10-14-00340-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2014)

Opinion

No. 10-14-00340-CR

11-20-2014

IN RE MILTON LEE GARDNER


Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this mandamus proceeding, Milton Lee Gardner requests this Court to order the Limestone County District Clerk to rule on his pretrial writ of habeas corpus filed with the trial court on September 9, 2014, and if the ruling does not grant relief, to transmit the writ to the Court of Appeals. There are procedural problems with this petition, including that it has not been served on the District Clerk as the respondent or the State as the real party in interest, see TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5; 52.2; however, we use Rule 2 and look beyond these deficiencies to dispose of Gardner's petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

As a Court of Appeals, we have no jurisdiction to compel a district clerk to act except to enforce our jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b) (West 2004). Gardner has not alleged any need for this Court to protect that jurisdiction.

Accordingly, Gardner's petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins
Petition dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed November 20, 2014
Do not publish
[OT06]


Summaries of

In re Gardner

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 20, 2014
No. 10-14-00340-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2014)
Case details for

In re Gardner

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MILTON LEE GARDNER

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

No. 10-14-00340-CR (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Gardner

Because we have no jurisdiction to compel a district clerk to act except to enforce our jurisdiction and…