From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Garcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 31, 2008
53 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 504137.

July 31, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 13, 2007, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Anna M. Garcia, New York City, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur.


Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant was discharged from her employment due to disqualifying misconduct. "It is well settled that an employee's falsification of time records may constitute disqualifying misconduct" ( Matter of Marione [Commissioner of Labor], 25 AD3d 1055, 1055 [citations omitted]; See Matter of Newkirk [Commissioner of Labor], 15 AD3d 827). Here, the testimony offered by the employer's representatives, together with the payroll records and other documentary evidence, established that claimant signed the employer's log sheet on three days when she was not actually at work. Claimant conceded that she may not have worked on the days in question but contended that any error in that regard was unintentional. Claimant's exculpatory explanations and her assertion that the erroneous entries were clerical errors made without any intention of deceiving the employer presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see Matter of Downing [Buffalo Hearing Speech Ctr. — Commissioner of Labor], 51 AD3d 1093, 1093; Matter of Marione [Commissioner of Labor], 25 AD3d at 1055; Matter of Newkirk [Commissioner of Labor], 15 AD3d at 827). Claimant's remaining contentions, to the extent not specifically addressed, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Garcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 31, 2008
53 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Garcia

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ANNA M. GARCIA, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 31, 2008

Citations

53 A.D.3d 1010 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 6491
863 N.Y.S.2d 282

Citing Cases

John v. Comm'r of Labor

We affirm. Falsification of time records has been held to constitute misconduct disqualifying a claimant from…

In re Nicole Crawford

We affirm. Substantial evidence supports the Board's decision, inasmuch as the falsification of time records…