From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Gabriel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Oct 20, 2010
No. 10-10-00290-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-10-00290-CR

Opinion delivered and filed October 20, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Original Proceeding. Petition dismissed as moot.

Before Chief Justice GRAY, Justice REYNA, and Justice DAVIS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Luther Gabriel seeks a writ of mandamus compelling Respondent, the Honorable Deborah Oakes Evans, Judge of the 87th District Court of Freestone County, to rule on his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. The State has filed a response demonstrating that Respondent has ruled on Gabriel's motion. Therefore, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot. See In re Luna, 317 S.W.3d 484, 484 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2010, orig. proceeding); In re Medrano, No. 13-10-00122-CR, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1988, at *1-2 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi Mar. 16, 2010, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (not designated for publication).

The State attached a certified copy of the docket sheet in the underlying cause to its response which reflects that Respondent denied Gabriel's motion for post-conviction DNA testing on October 4, 2010 because "1) No evidence exists to be subjected to DNA [testing], and 2) There was never any biological evidence collected that still exists or ever existed that could be tested for DNA."


Summaries of

In re Gabriel

Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco
Oct 20, 2010
No. 10-10-00290-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2010)
Case details for

In re Gabriel

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LUTHER GABRIEL

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Tenth District, Waco

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

No. 10-10-00290-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2010)

Citing Cases

In re Baunchand

Recognizing, however, that the trial court could have modified its prior orders, and thus the extent of or…