From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re G. L. T.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jul 28, 2021
313 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A174966 A174967 A174962 A174965

07-28-2021

In the Matter of G. L. T., a Child. v. D. L. H., Appellant. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, In the Matter of R. J. T., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. D. L. H., Appellant. In the Matter of J. C. T., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. D. L. H., Appellant. In the Matter of E. J. T., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. D. L. H., Appellant.

Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Holly Telerant, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Submitted June 29, 2021

Jackson County Circuit Court 20JU04703, 20JU04704, 20JU04705, 20JU04706 Benjamin M. Bloom, Judge.

Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Holly Telerant, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Carson L. Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals a dependency judgment taking jurisdiction over four of her children. On appeal, she challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the juvenile court's determination that it had jurisdiction over each child. Having reviewed the record, we disagree that there is insufficient evidence to support the juvenile court's jurisdiction determination. Mother also raises an unpreserved challenge to the court's legal authority to order her to participate in a psychological evaluation. Even assuming the court erred, and plainly so, mother has since completed the psychological evaluation and has not explained on appeal how, under those circumstances, a ruling in her favor would afford her meaningful relief; we therefore would decline to exercise our discretion to correct the alleged error.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

In re G. L. T.

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Jul 28, 2021
313 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

In re G. L. T.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of G. L. T., a Child. v. D. L. H., Appellant. DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon

Date published: Jul 28, 2021

Citations

313 Or. App. 624 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)