From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fusco

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 24, 2017
228 N.J. 159 (N.J. 2017)

Opinion

03-24-2017

In the MATTER OF Frank C. FUSCO, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No. 007621995)


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16–020, concluding that FRANK C. FUSCO of CLIFTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1995, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of the matter) RPC 1.5(b) (failure to communicate in writing the basis or rate of the fee), and RPC 5.4(a) (sharing legal fees with a nonlawyer), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that FRANK C. FUSCO is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Fusco

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 24, 2017
228 N.J. 159 (N.J. 2017)
Case details for

In re Fusco

Case Details

Full title:In the MATTER OF Frank C. FUSCO, an Attorney At Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 24, 2017

Citations

228 N.J. 159 (N.J. 2017)
155 A.3d 983

Citing Cases

In re Del Tufo

Sharing fees with a nonlawyer has resulted in discipline ranging from an admonition to a term of suspension,…