In re Freese

1 Citing case

  1. Dych v. Vanbrocklin (In re Vanbrocklin)

    566 B.R. 90 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2017)   Cited 4 times

    The rule encourages full disclosure by debtors; it is not for the debtor to decide whether information will be relevant to creditors. SeeIn re Kim , 2011 WL 5902461, at *6 (quoting Lincoln Savs. Bank v. Freese (In re Freese) , 2011 WL 2604750, at *5 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa June 30, 2011) ) ("Consequently, the debtor has an ‘uncompromising duty to disclose’ his or her financial information, not ‘to pick and choose or to obfuscate the answers.’ "); In re Matus , 303 B.R. at 675 ; see alsoIn re Chalik , 748 F.2d at 618 ("The veracity of the [debtor's] statements is essential to the successful administration of the Bankruptcy Act.").