Finding no open claims, the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection similarly advises that it does not oppose respondent's reinstatement application. Initially, we note that respondent has properly submitted a duly-sworn affidavit in the form provided in appendix D to the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) part 1240 (see Matter of Freeman, 192 A.D.3d 1377, 1378 [2021]; see also Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [d]). Respondent has also submitted a timely affidavit of compliance and supplemental affidavit addressing his compliance with the order of suspension (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.15 [f]). Based on the entirety of the submissions, we find that respondent has established by clear and convincing evidence that he has satisfied the three-part test applicable to all attorneys seeking reinstatement from a disciplinary suspension (see Matter of Njogu, 175 A.D.3d 800, 800-801 [2019]).
Finding no open claims, the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection similarly advises that it does not oppose respondent's reinstatement application. Initially, we note that respondent has properly submitted a duly-sworn affidavit in the form provided in appendix D to the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) part 1240 (seeMatter of Freeman, 192 A.D.3d 1377, 1378, 140 N.Y.S.3d 789 [2021] ; see also Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [d]). Respondent has also submitted a timely affidavit of compliance and supplemental affidavit addressing his compliance with the order of suspension (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [ 22 NYCRR] § 1240.15 [f]).
Finding no open claims, the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection similarly advises that it does not oppose respondent's reinstatement application. Initially, we note that respondent has properly submitted a duly-sworn affidavit in the form provided in appendix D to the Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters (22 NYCRR) part 1240 (see Matter of Freeman, 192 A.D.3d 1377, 1378 [2021]; see also Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16 [d]). Respondent has also submitted a timely affidavit of compliance and supplemental affidavit addressing his compliance with the order of suspension (see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.15 [f]). Based on the entirety of the submissions, we find that respondent has established by clear and convincing evidence that he has satisfied the three-part test applicable to all attorneys seeking reinstatement from a disciplinary suspension (see Matter of Njogu, 175 A.D.3d 800, 800-801 [2019]).