From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Freeman

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Oct 12, 2011
No. 01-11-00817-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 01-11-00817-CR

Opinion issued October 12, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices KEYES, HIGLEY, and MASSENGALE.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, Jacqueline Freeman, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. Relator contends that "the trial court erred when it failed to address [her] plea to its jurisdiction" and "when it continued to press forward to trial date without resolving the jurisdiction question." Relator requests this Court to order the trial court "to follow the law or in the alternative, [to] rule that [the trial court] does not have jurisdiction over [relator] and that all the charges against her should be dismissed." We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

Respondent is The Honorable David Mendoza, presiding judge of the 178th District Court of Harris County, Texas. The underlying suit is The State of Texas v. Jacqueline Freeman, No. 1280764 in the 178th District Court of Harris County, Texas, The Hon. David Mendoza, presiding.


Summaries of

In re Freeman

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Oct 12, 2011
No. 01-11-00817-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 12, 2011)
Case details for

In re Freeman

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JACQUELINE FREEMAN, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Oct 12, 2011

Citations

No. 01-11-00817-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 12, 2011)