In re Freeman

Full title: IN RE CLAY FREEMAN AND MARCEL BROEKMAAT

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 15, 2013

2012-1158 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 15, 2013)

Opinion

2012-1158

01-15-2013

IN RE CLAY FREEMAN AND MARCEL BROEKMAAT

CHRISTOPHER J. ROURK, Jackson Walker L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, argued for appellants. SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

(Serial No. 11/235,344)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER J. ROURK, Jackson Walker L.L.P., of Dallas, Texas, argued for appellants.

SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

______________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk