From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Freedom R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2016
142 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-29-2016

In re FREEDOM R., and Others, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years, etc., Jamila W., Respondent–Appellant, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Benjamin Welikson of counsel), for respondent. Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Stern of counsel), attorney for the children.


Larry S. Bachner, Jamaica, for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Benjamin Welikson of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Stern of counsel), attorney for the children.

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about July 23, 2015, which granted petitioner Administration for Children's Services' motion for an order directing that the subject children receive all immunizations necessary to allow them to attend New York State Department of Education schools, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Because it is undisputed that the children have already been vaccinated, the appeal is moot. The issues presented by this appeal are not sufficiently substantial or novel to warrant invocation of the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Coleman v. Daines, 79 A.D.3d 554, 558, 913 N.Y.S.2d 83 [1st Dept.2010], affd. 19 N.Y.3d 1087, 955 N.Y.S.2d 831, 979 N.E.2d 1158 [2012] ). Were we to reach the merits of the appeal, we would affirm since the mother failed to submit an affidavit, relying only on an affirmation of counsel without any supporting evidence, and thus failed to demonstrate that her opposition to immunization stems from beliefs that are religious in nature, and are genuinely and sincerely held (see Matter of Isaac J. [Joyce J.], 75 A.D.3d 506, 507, 904 N.Y.S.2d 755 [2d Dept.2010] ; Matter of Nassau County Dept. of Social Servs. v. R.B., 23 Misc.3d 270, 274–275, 870 N.Y.S.2d 874 [Fam.Ct., Nassau County 2008] ).

We have considered the remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ACOSTA, SAXE, MOSKOWITZ, GESMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Freedom R.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 29, 2016
142 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Freedom R.

Case Details

Full title:In re FREEDOM R., and Others, Children Under the Age of Eighteen Years…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 29, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
142 A.D.3d 922
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6256

Citing Cases

Rensselaer Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Ashleigh Z. (In re Athena Y.)

Hearings have routinely been required in the context of overriding parents’ medical decisions for their…