Summary
explaining court of appeals did not have jurisdiction over relator's petition attacking prior convictions used for enhancement
Summary of this case from In re EvansOpinion
No. 05-07-00193-CV
Opinion issued March 22, 2007.
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. MA-93-62444-A and MB-94-46041-A.
Before Justices MOSELEY, BRIDGES, and FRANCIS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Based on relator's petition, he appears to be attacking two prior misdemeanor convictions used to enhance another misdemeanor offense to a state jail felony. Relator has filed no record for our review. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7. However, it appears that relator is seeking post-conviction relief in a felony case. We do not have jurisdiction to grant post-conviction relief. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (orig. proceeding); In re McFee, 53 S.W3d 715, 717 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DISMISS the relator's petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.