From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Francis

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 15, 2017
2016-2695 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)

Opinion

2016-2695

08-15-2017

IN RE: MITCHELL J. FRANCIS, Appellant

HOWARD NEAL FLAXMAN, Welsh Flaxman & Gitler LLC, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. LORE A. UNT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, COKE MORGAN STEWART.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/111,698.

JUDGMENT

HOWARD NEAL FLAXMAN, Welsh Flaxman & Gitler LLC, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. LORE A. UNT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MAI-TRANG DUC DANG, BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, COKE MORGAN STEWART. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 15, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Francis

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Aug 15, 2017
2016-2695 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)
Case details for

In re Francis

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: MITCHELL J. FRANCIS, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 15, 2017

Citations

2016-2695 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)