From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 11, 2011
06 MD 1789 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

06 MD 1789 (JFK).

October 11, 2011


ORDER


The assertion in Mr. O'Brien's letter dated October 5, 2011, that the Court indicated the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee could "pick" the "next case for trial" is absolutely inaccurate. Mr. O'Brien made no such request, and there was no discussion between the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, Merck Sharp Dohme Corp., and the Court concerning the selection of a new case for trial to replace Raber v. Merck Co., Inc., 06 Civ. 6295 (JFK).

Arcemont v. Merck Co., Inc., 07 Civ. 2389 (JFK) will not be the next case tried.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 11, 2011
06 MD 1789 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

In re Fosamax Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This document relates to all…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

06 MD 1789 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 11, 2011)