From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Flonase Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-3149 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 08-3149 CIVIL ACTION No. 08-3301

08-20-2012

In re FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO All Actions


ORDER

AND NOW, this _20TH_ day of _AUGUST ___ 2012, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David Strawbridge (ECF No. 399 in 08-3149, ECF No. 487 in 08-33-1) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. Therefore, all those documents and/or redactions within documents identified in the Report's attached chart where the "PRIVILEGED?" column designates a "yes" be protected from discovery, as they "were created for the purpose of providing or obtaining legal advice."

No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

______________

ANITA B. BRODY, J.
Copies VIA ECF on ___to: Copies MAILED on _____ to: O:\ABB 2012\A - K\Flonase Order re Privilege.wpd


Summaries of

In re Flonase Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 20, 2012
CIVIL ACTION No. 08-3149 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2012)
Case details for

In re Flonase Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re FLONASE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO All Actions

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 08-3149 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2012)