From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Flentroy

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jan 13, 2012
NO. 03-12-00003-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 03-12-00003-CV

01-13-2012

In re Charlie Flentroy


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Charlie Flentroy petitions for a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to rule on his application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus.

Only the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction habeas corpus proceedings. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2011). Because Flentroy's petition for mandamus relief is based on the district court's alleged failure to rule on his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus, we lack jurisdiction over his complaint. See McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); see also In re Washington, No. 14-09-00158-CR, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 3788, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, orig. proceeding); cf. Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 22.221(b) (West 2004) (authorizing courts of appeals to issue writs of mandamus to enforce court's jurisdiction).

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Jeff Rose, Justice Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose


Summaries of

In re Flentroy

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jan 13, 2012
NO. 03-12-00003-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

In re Flentroy

Case Details

Full title:In re Charlie Flentroy

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

NO. 03-12-00003-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Thompson

Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to address Relator's complaint that the trial court has failed to rule on…