From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fitzpatrick

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 14, 2022
No. 05-22-00425-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2022)

Opinion

05-22-00425-CV

07-14-2022

IN RE JOHN MICHAEL FITZPATRICK, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-50901-2020

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE.

Relator's May 4, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial court's "Temporary Orders Pending Appeal." Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re Copart, Inc., 619 S.W.3d 710, 713 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (citing In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)).

After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has not shown his entitlement to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Fitzpatrick

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jul 14, 2022
No. 05-22-00425-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2022)
Case details for

In re Fitzpatrick

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JOHN MICHAEL FITZPATRICK, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jul 14, 2022

Citations

No. 05-22-00425-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 14, 2022)