In re Fisch

Full title: IN RE HARRY FISCH

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

2011-1068 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

2011-1068

12-12-2011

IN RE HARRY FISCH

WILLIAM F. SMITH, Woodcock Washburn, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN F. MURPHY. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor Associate, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor.

Per Curiam

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 90/008,024.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM F. SMITH, Woodcock Washburn, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN F. MURPHY.

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor Associate, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L. R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Jan horbaly

Clerk