From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Solis Law Firm

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jul 6, 2016
NUMBER 13-16-00350-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2016)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00350-CV

07-06-2016

IN RE SOLIS LAW FIRM


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
Per CuriamOrder

Relator, Solis Law Firm, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on July 5, 2016, requesting that we direct the trial court to withdraw its June 1, 2016 order and issue an order: (1) vacating the trial court's June 1, 2016 rulings denying Relator's objections to Plaintiffs' Exhibits B and D offered in support of their Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs' Counsel and sustain such objections; (2) state Marlene Dougherty is disqualified from acting as counsel in this matter; (3) state Plaintiffs are directed to obtain new counsel within thirty days from the date of Dougherty's dismissal; and (4) state that if Plaintiffs fail to obtain new counsel, this action will be dismissed. The Court requests that the real party in interest, Francisco Javier Barrios Almeida, Marco Antonio Barrios Rojo, Erika Barraza Moreno and Roger Wayne Avelar, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of twenty days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 6th day of July, 2016.


Summaries of

In re Solis Law Firm

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jul 6, 2016
NUMBER 13-16-00350-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2016)
Case details for

In re Solis Law Firm

Case Details

Full title:IN RE SOLIS LAW FIRM

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jul 6, 2016

Citations

NUMBER 13-16-00350-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 6, 2016)