From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Finkelstein

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 11, 1925
3 F.2d 1006 (E.D. Pa. 1925)

Opinion

No. 7221.

February 11, 1925.

Reber, Granger Montgomery and J. Howard Reber, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for trustee.

Furth, Singer Bortin and David Bortin, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for bankrupt.


In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Max Finkelstein, individually and trading as the Quaker Shoe Company, bankrupt. On certificate of review of order of referee. Dismissed.


The order of the referee certified for review was brought before the court upon a certificate of the referee. It appears by the record certified that the bankrupt did not file with the referee a petition for review in accordance with General Order XXVII. As the General Order is mandatory in requiring a petition of the party desiring a review, this court, in the absence of such a petition, has no authority to review the action of the referee. In re Russell (D.C.) 105 F. 501; In re Home Discount Co. (D.C.) 147 F. 538, 17 Am. Bankr. Rep. 168.

The application for review of the order of the referee will therefore be dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Finkelstein

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 11, 1925
3 F.2d 1006 (E.D. Pa. 1925)
Case details for

In re Finkelstein

Case Details

Full title:In re FINKELSTEIN

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 11, 1925

Citations

3 F.2d 1006 (E.D. Pa. 1925)

Citing Cases

In re Wilkes Barre Yellow Cab Co. Inc.

In the absence of such a petition, this court has no authority to review an order made by the referee. In re…

In re Mt. Jessup Coal Co.

In the absence of such a petition, this court has no authority to review an order made by the referee. In re…