From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Finjan, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 6, 2019
2018-2354 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2019)

Opinion

2018-2354

09-06-2019

IN RE: FINJAN, INC., Appellant

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT MCBRIDE, COKE MORGAN STEWART.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/013,660.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT MCBRIDE, COKE MORGAN STEWART. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 6, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Finjan, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 6, 2019
2018-2354 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2019)
Case details for

In re Finjan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: FINJAN, INC., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 2019

Citations

2018-2354 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2019)