In re Finjan, Inc.

Full title: IN RE FINJAN, INC.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

491 F. App'x 194 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2011-1542

01-11-2013

IN RE FINJAN, INC.

PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were LISA KOBIALKA and JAMES R. HANNAH. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and COKE MORGAN STEWART and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

(Reexamination No. 90/008,684)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

PAUL J. ANDRE, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were LISA KOBIALKA and JAMES R. HANNAH.

NATHAN K. KELLEY, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and COKE MORGAN STEWART and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors. THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, AND O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk