From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Finisar Corp. Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2011
Master File No. C-06-07660-RMW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Master File No. C-06-07660-RMW

11-09-2011

In re FINISAR CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Lloyd Winawer (State Bar No. 157823) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Stephen D. Poss (Pro Hac Vice) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Attorneys for Defendants Michael C. Child, Roger C. Ferguson, Frank H. Levinson, Robert N. Stephens, and Dominique Trempont


Lloyd Winawer (State Bar No. 157823)

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Stephen D. Poss (Pro Hac Vice)

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

Attorneys for Defendants Michael C. Child,

Roger C. Ferguson, Frank H. Levinson,

Robert N. Stephens, and Dominique Trempont

STIPULATION AND

ORDER REGARDING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND

HEARING DATE


Judge: The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte

WHEREAS, the Court held a Case Management Conference in this action on September 14, 2011;

WHEREAS, at the September 14, 2011 Case Management Conference, pursuant to the parties' agreement, the Court scheduled for December 9, 2011 (1) a Further Case Management Conference, and (2) the hearing on motions to dismiss to be filed by the defendants;

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's September 16, 2011 Order, on October 7, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a letter brief in support of their request that the Court order Finisar Corporation to begin the production of relevant documents immediately, and defendants filed a letter brief in opposition to plaintiffs' request on October 14, 2011;

WHEREAS, given the number of individuals named as defendants and the significant expense involved in litigating this action, including the filing of briefs in support of and in opposition to motions to dismiss, and in an effort to preserve judicial resources, the undersigned counsel and parties (the "Parties") have met and conferred and agreed to engage in nonbinding mediation before the Honorable Edward A. Infante (Ret.) (the "Mediation");

WHEREAS, the Parties expect that the Mediation will commence on or before January 18, 2012, and are working diligently to prepare for the Mediation, including by exchanging relevant information;

WHEREAS, for the reasons discussed above and to facilitate the Mediation, justification and good cause exists for (1) vacating the December 9, 2011 Further Case Management Conference and motion to dismiss hearing date, (2) continuing until February 17, 2012 the date by which any defendant must file a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Supplemental Second Amended Consolidated Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint ("SSAC") or other responsive pleading, and (3) deferring a ruling on the parties' letter briefs regarding the production of documents until a ruling is requested by any party.

NOW THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

(1) The Further Case Management Conference and motion to dismiss hearing scheduled for December 9, 2011 are vacated;

(2) The date by which any defendant must file a motion to dismiss the SSAC or other responsive pleading is continued until February 17, 2012;

(3) The Court shall defer ruling on the parties' letter briefs until a ruling is requested by any party; and

(4) The Parties will advise the Court of the status of this action within 48 hours of the completion of the Mediation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

CHRISTOPHER M. WOOD

Shawn A. Williams

Christopher M. Wood

Post Montgomery Center

Fax: (415) 288-4534

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP

Travis E. Downs III

SAXENA WHITE P.A.

Maya S. Saxena

Joseph E. White

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

DAVID PRIEBE

Shirli Fabbri Weiss

David Priebe

Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Finisar

Corporation

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI,

Professional Corporation

JARED L. KOPEL

Jared L. Kopel

Nicole Healy

Attorneys for Defendant Jerry S. Rawls

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

LLOYD WINAWER

Stephen D. Poss (pro hac vice)

Exchange Place

Fax: (650) 853-1038

Attorneys for Defendants Michael C. Child,

Roger C. Ferguson, Frank H. Levinson, Robert

N. Stephens, and Dominique Trempont

HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY

FALK & RABKIN, P.C.

SARAH A. GOOD

Sarah A. Good

Attorneys for Defendants David Buse, John

Drury, Mark Farley, Stephen Workman, and

Joseph Young

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

HONORABLE RONALD M. WHYTE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ECF CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X.B., the filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document.

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

By: Lloyd Winawer

Attorneys for Defendants

Michael C. Child, Roger C. Ferguson, Frank H.

Levinson, Robert N. Stephens, and Dominique

Trempont

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I further certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will be sent to those indicated as non registered participants on November 4, 2011.

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP

By: Lloyd Winawer

Attorneys for Defendants

Michael C. Child, Roger C. Ferguson, Frank H.

Levinson, Robert N. Stephens, and Dominique

Trempont


Summaries of

In re Finisar Corp. Derivative Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2011
Master File No. C-06-07660-RMW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)
Case details for

In re Finisar Corp. Derivative Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re FINISAR CORPORATION DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2011

Citations

Master File No. C-06-07660-RMW (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011)