From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fineberg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 27, 2022
No. 05-21-00524-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2022)

Opinion

05-21-00524-CV

01-27-2022

IN RE LISA FINEBERG, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14-14944

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE

In this original proceeding, relator asks this Court to compel the recusal of the Honorable Tammy Kemp, the presiding judge of the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County. Relator also complains that Assigned Judge Jim Jordan should have recused himself from hearing the motion to recuse Judge Kemp.

A writ of mandamus issues to correct a clear abuse of discretion when no adequate remedy by appeal exists. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Although mandamus is not an equitable remedy, its issuance is largely controlled by equitable principles. Rivercenter Assocs. v. Rivera, 858 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. 1993) (orig. proceeding). One such principle is that "equity aids the diligent and not those who slumber on their rights." Id. (internal brackets and quotation marks omitted). Thus, delaying the filing of a petition for mandamus relief may waive the right to mandamus unless the relator can justify the delay. In re Int'l Profit Assocs., Inc., 274 S.W.3d 672, 676 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding). "A delay of only a few months can constitute laches and result in denial of mandamus relief." In re Dryden Co., No. 05-20-00028-CV, 2020 WL 205314, at *1 (Tex. App.-Dallas Jan. 14, 2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

Here, relator waited almost fourteen months to file a petition for writ of mandamus, after this Court dismissed her appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denied her request to treat the notice of appeal as a mandamus petition without prejudice to refiling a proper petition. At that point, it had been nearly two years since the most recent complained-of action. Relator has offered no explanation for this lengthy delay. Accordingly, because we conclude that relator's unexplained delay bars her right to mandamus relief, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Fineberg

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 27, 2022
No. 05-21-00524-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2022)
Case details for

In re Fineberg

Case Details

Full title:IN RE LISA FINEBERG, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 27, 2022

Citations

No. 05-21-00524-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 27, 2022)