From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Filler

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 8, 2016
636 F. App'x 802 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2015-1687

02-08-2016

IN RE: AARON GERSHON FILLER, Appellant

AARON GERSHON FILLER, Tensor Law, P.C., Santa Monica, CA, argued pro se. SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/012,388.

JUDGMENT

AARON GERSHON FILLER, Tensor Law, P.C., Santa Monica, CA, argued pro se. SARAH E. CRAVEN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2016

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Filler

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 8, 2016
636 F. App'x 802 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Case details for

In re Filler

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: AARON GERSHON FILLER, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 2016

Citations

636 F. App'x 802 (Fed. Cir. 2016)