From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ferri

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 13, 2017
2016-1877 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)

Opinion

2016-1877

02-13-2017

IN RE: NICHOLAS WILLIAM FERRI, DAVID J. EARLEY, Appellants

DANIEL P. HOMILLER, Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, PLLC, Cary, NC, argued for appellants. JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SARAH E. CRAVEN.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/160,823.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL P. HOMILLER, Murphy, Bilak & Homiller, PLLC, Cary, NC, argued for appellants. JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SARAH E. CRAVEN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 13, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Ferri

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Feb 13, 2017
2016-1877 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)
Case details for

In re Ferri

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: NICHOLAS WILLIAM FERRI, DAVID J. EARLEY, Appellants

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 2017

Citations

2016-1877 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 13, 2017)