From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fernando Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 2011
85 A.D.3d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 5439.

June 28, 2011.

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about June 2, 2009, which, inter alia, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Kenneth Walsh, Brooklyn, for appellant.

Law Office of James M. Abramson, PLLC, New York (Dawn M. Orsatti of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Diane Pazar of counsel), attorney for the child.

Before: Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Renwick, DeGrasse and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


The finding of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent's failure to plan for the child's future, notwithstanding the agency's diligent efforts (Social Services Law § 384-b [a]). The record shows that the agency met with respondent to review her service plan and discuss the importance of compliance ( see Matter of Lady Justice I., 50 AD3d 425). The agency also referred respondent to parenting skills training, mental health therapy, housing assistance agencies, and scheduled regular visits with the child that accommodated her schedule. Despite these diligent efforts, respondent failed to attend therapy, obtain suitable housing or visit with the child on a consistent basis ( see Matter of Kevin J., 55 AD3d 468, lv denied 11 NY3d 715; Matter of William P, 23 AD3d 237).

A preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that the termination of respondent's parental rights was in the best interests of the child, who has been living with his foster family for most of his life ( see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136, 147-148). A suspended judgment was not appropriate under the circumstances, given that the child was thriving in a loving foster home, where his special needs were being met ( see Matter of Omar Saheem Ali J. [Matthew J.], 80 AD3d 463).


Summaries of

In re Fernando Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 2011
85 A.D.3d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Fernando Alexander

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FERNANDO ALEXANDER B., a Child Alleged to be Permanently…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 2011

Citations

85 A.D.3d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5558
925 N.Y.S.2d 823

Citing Cases

In Matter of Nakai H. v. Angela B.H.

Clear and convincing evidence supports the finding of permanent neglect (Social Services Law § 384-b[a]). The…

W.Z. v. Good Shepherd Serv. (In re K.Y.Z.)

[7] A preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that it was in the child’s best interests to be freed for…