From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fell

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 29, 2014
219 N.J. 425 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-09-29

In the Matter of Joseph J. FELL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 033601992).


ORDER

This matter have been duly presented pursuant to Rule 1:20–10(b), following the granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 14–183 of JOSEPH J. FELL of BERNARDSVILLE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992;

And the District XB Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 5.5(a)(1) (practicing law while ineligible);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 5.5(a)(1), and that said conduct warrants an admonition to a reprimand;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XB–2013–0008E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20–16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOSEPH J. FELL of BERNARDSVILLE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Fell

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 29, 2014
219 N.J. 425 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Fell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Joseph J. FELL, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Sep 29, 2014

Citations

219 N.J. 425 (N.J. 2014)
219 N.J. 425

Citing Cases

In re Zuvich

See, e.g., In re Frayne, 220 N.J. 23 (2014) (default; reprimand imposed on attorney who practiced law while…

In re Wright

Typically, attorneys who practice, knowing that they are not eligible to do so, have received reprimands. See…