From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Felix R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 21, 1999

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J., at suppression hearing; Gayle Roberts, J., at fact-finding and disposition), entered on or about August 25, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for 18 months following a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the third and fourth degrees and unlawful possession of weapons by persons under 16, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the petition dismissed. Order, same court (John Hunt, J.,) entered on or about August 25, 1998, which revoked appellant's probation and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for 12 months, upon a determination that appellant had violated his probation, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the petition dismissed.


It is well established that before a person may be forcibly stopped the police must have a reasonable suspicion that the person is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a crime (Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22; People v. Martinez, 80 N.Y.2d 444, 447; People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223; CPL 140.50) Here, the undefined bulge in the knapsack of appellant's friend, did not, without more, supply the necessary predicate to stop appellant. Significantly, the officers failed to identify any basis for believing that the knapsack contained a weapon.

In addition, the subsequent frisk of appellant was not justified. At the pre-trial suppression hearing, the testifying officer was unable to enunciate any meaningful basis for believing that the undefined bulge in appellant's jacket pocket was a gun. The Court of Appeals has held that an undefined bulge in a jacket pocket, as opposed to a waistband bulge, is hardly indicative of criminality (People v. Holmes, 81 N.Y.2d 1056, 1058) In the absence of some indication that appellant was carrying a weapon, the officer's conduct in frisking him was improper (CPL 140.50; see, People v. Powell, 246 A.D.2d 366, appeal dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 886)

Finally, Family Court lacked jurisdiction to find appellant in violation of his probation since the petition for violation of probation was filed on August 12, 1998, after the term of probation had already expired (Family Court Act §§ 360.1, 360.2)

NARDELLI, J.P., WILLIAMS, TOM, LERNER, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Felix R

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 21, 1999
265 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

In re Felix R

Case Details

Full title:IN RE FELIX R., A Person Alleged to be A Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 455

Citing Cases

St. Louis v. Bratton

Substantial evidence supports the findings that petitioner improperly stopped a vehicle and frisked the…

In the Matter of Carliesha C

We reject the contention of respondent that Family Court lacked authority to issue a dispositional order…