From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Feldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 28, 2011
86 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

July 28, 2011.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995. She was previously admitted in New Jersey in 1994, where she maintains an office for the practice of law.

Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Michael K. Creaser of counsel), for petitioner.

Deborah Feldstein, Denville, New Jersey, respondent pro se.

Before: Rose, J.P., Stein, McCarthy, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ.


By order dated October 26, 2010, the New Jersey Supreme Court publicly reprimanded respondent for failing to set forth in writing the basis or rate of attorney's fees and for engaging in a conflict of interest.

As a result of the discipline imposed in New Jersey, petitioner moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court's rules ( see 22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has submitted a reply affidavit wherein she states that she does not oppose petitioner's motion. We grant the motion and further conclude that, under the circumstances presented, respondent should be censured in this state.

Ordered that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is hereby censured.


Summaries of

In re Feldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 28, 2011
86 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Feldstein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEBORAH FELDSTEIN, an Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 28, 2011

Citations

86 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 6074
927 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

In re Chang

While the record before us does not indicate that respondent's actions caused any harm to clients, "[f]ew, if…