From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Faulkner

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 21, 2020
S262958 (Cal. Oct. 21, 2020)

Opinion

S262958

10-21-2020

FAULKNER, JR., (KENNETH LEWIS) ON H.C.


The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. (See In re Robbins (1998) 18 Cal.4th 770, 780 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are untimely]; In re Clark (1993) 5 Cal.4th 750, 767-769 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are successive]; In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity].) Individual claims are denied, as applicable. (See In re Waltreus (1965) 62 Cal.2d 218, 225 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that were rejected on appeal]; In re Dixon (1953) 41 Cal.2d 756, 759 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that could have been, but were not, raised on appeal]; In re Lindley (1947) 29 Cal.2d 709, 723 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that attack the sufficiency of the evidence]; In re Miller (1941) 17 Cal.2d 734, 735 [courts will not entertain habeas corpus claims that are repetitive].)


Summaries of

In re Faulkner

California Supreme Court (Minute Order)
Oct 21, 2020
S262958 (Cal. Oct. 21, 2020)
Case details for

In re Faulkner

Case Details

Full title:FAULKNER, JR., (KENNETH LEWIS) ON H.C.

Court:California Supreme Court (Minute Order)

Date published: Oct 21, 2020

Citations

S262958 (Cal. Oct. 21, 2020)