From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Fasteners Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1912 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1912

08-06-2012

IN RE FASTENERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of August 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Joint Motion for Section 1292(b) Certification for Immediate Appeal (ECF No. 94), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

______________

R. BARCLAY SURRICK , J.


Summaries of

In re Fasteners Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 6, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1912 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

In re Fasteners Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE FASTENERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1912 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Rankin v. PTC All. LLC

. However, “‘[c]ertification to appeal [an] interlocutory order is inappropriate when the underlying order…

Johnson v. Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

However, “‘[certification to appeal [an] interlocutory [o]rder is inappropriate when the underlying order…