Opinion
Case No. 01-60386-DOT, Chapter 11, Procedurally Consolidated
July 24, 2002
Counsel for Plaintiffs: H. Jason Gold, Esq., Valerie P. Morrison, Esq. and Raymond R. Pring, Esq. with Wiley, Rein Fielding LLP from McLean, VA.
Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors: Paul M. Nussbaum, Esquire and Brent C. Strickland, Esquire with Whiteford, Taylor Preston L.L.P. from Baltimore, Maryland.
Counsel for the Official and Committee of Unsecured Creditors: H. Slayton Dabney, Jr., Esquire and Douglas M. Foley, Esquire from Richmond, Virginia.
Chapter 11 Trustee: Keith L. Phillips, Esquire from Richmond, Virginia.
Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee: Tyler P. Brown, Esquire with Hunton Williams from Richmond, Virginia.
Acting Assistant U.S. Trustee: Robert B. Van Arsdale, Esquire with the Office of the United States Trustee from Richmond, Virginia.
Special Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee: Bruce H. Matson, Esquire (Va. Bar No. 22874), Thomas A. Coulter, Esquire (admitted pro hac vice) and Leclair Ryan, with a Professional Corporation from Richmond, Virginia.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court upon the Amended Emergency Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay to Repossess Blank Check Money Order Stock, or in the Alternative, for Temporary Restraining Order Directing Debtors to Segregate Proceeds of Money Order Sales (the "Emergency Stay Motion") filed by Merchants Express Money Order Company and MEMO Money Order Company ("MEMO"), and upon the Response to and Motion to Dismiss Merchants Express Money Order Company and MEMO Money Order Company's Amended Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay filed by the Chapter 11 Trustee. After considering the pleadings and argument of counsel, the Court determined that MEMO's Amended Emergency Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay should be transferred to Judge Mayer. Based upon the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED that MEMO's Amended Emergency Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay is transferred to the Honorable Judge Robert G. Mayer for disposition.
In accordance with Local Rule 9022-1. the foregoing proposed Order has been served upon all of the following necessary parties: