From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Farrell

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Aug 13, 2007
No. 06-10863, A.P. No. 07-1038 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-10863, A.P. No. 07-1038.

August 13, 2007


Memorandum on Motion for Order Shortening Time


Plaintiff failed to appear for a regularly-scheduled scheduling conference, and the court dismissed the case for failure to prosecute. This sanction is specifically authorized by FRCP 37(b)(2)(C), FRCP 16(f) and FRBP 7016.

It may well be that the court will relieve plaintiff from this default if his claim is colorable and he can demonstrate excusable neglect. At a very minimum, however, defendants must be compensated for the expense of having their attorney appear for nothing. A motion for relief from default must be made on notice. Unless there is a valid reason for shortening time, the normal 28 days notice must be given.


Summaries of

In re Farrell

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Aug 13, 2007
No. 06-10863, A.P. No. 07-1038 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2007)
Case details for

In re Farrell

Case Details

Full title:In re MICHAEL and CHRISTINE FARRELL, Debtor(s). ROGER ASHKENAZI…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Date published: Aug 13, 2007

Citations

No. 06-10863, A.P. No. 07-1038 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2007)