Opinion
Argued and Submitted September 14, 2006.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Page 592.
N. Robert Stoll, Esq., Timothy S. Dejong, Esq., Jennifer A. Wagner, Esq.,
Stoll, Stoll, Berne, Lokting & Schlachter, PC, Portland, OR, Steven G. Zieff, Kenneth J. Sugarman, Esq., Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & True, Michael Rubin, Esq., Peder J.V. Thoreen, Esq., Altshuler, Berzon, Nussbaum, Rubin & Demain, James M. Finberg, Esq., Eve H. Cervantez, Esq., Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Todd Jackson, Jeffrey J. Lewis, Lewis, Feinberg, Renaker & Jackson, PC, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs.
Barry G. Reed, Esq., Zimmerman Reed, Scottsdale, AZ, Timothy J. Becker, Esq., Zimmerman Reed, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN, Richard J. Vangelisti, Esq., Vangelisti Law Offices, PC, Portland, OR, for Intervenor-Appellant.
Lee T. Paterson, Esq., Jessie A. Kohler, Winston & Strawn, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Barnes H. Ellis, Esq., James N. Westwood, Esq, Stoel Rives, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Robert E. Jones, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-01439-REJ.
Before: SILVERMAN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and RHOADES, District Judge.
The Honorable John S. Rhoades, Sr., Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
On January 12, 2005, the district court issued an injunction to protect its judgment in a companion case to this appeal, Miller, et al. v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, 466 F.3d 853 (9th Cir.2006). Now that we have reversed that judgment with respect to claims under Minnesota's Fair Labor Standards Act, the district court's denial of the Milner Class's motion to vacate the injunction is reversed. We remand with instructions to the district court to vacate its injunction.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.